Facts:
This
is a consolidated case involving Diwalwal Gold Rush Area” in Mt. Diwata,
Mindanao and MISSMA.
The
Bureau of Forest Development issued to Marcopper Mining Corporation (Marcopper)
a prospecting permit covering 4,941 hectares within the Agusan-Davao-Surigao
Forest Reserve. This forest reserve was instituted by Proclamation No. 369
issued by then Governor General Dwight F. Davis on February 27, 1931. Also, the
Bureau of Mines and Geo-Sciences issued to Marcopper a permit to explore the
same area.
The
Mines and Geo-Sciences Bureau director ordered the publication of SMGMC’s
application for Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSA No. 128) for the 4,941
hectares covered by EP 133.
MISSMA
et. al., filed an adverse claim which were were anchored on DENR Administrative
Order No. 669 declaring 729 hectares of the Agusan-Davao-Surigao Forest Reserve
as forest land open for small-scale mining purposes, subject to existing and
valid private rights.
The
panel of arbitrators reiterated the validity of EP 133 and dismissed all
adverse claims on MPSA No. 128. Both SMGMC and the adverse claimants questioned
the Mines Adjudication Board’s decision before this court. These petitions were
remanded to the Court of Appeals. Meanwhile, independent of the MAB decision
and the appeals to the Court of Appeals and this court, the Provincial Mining
Regulatory Board of Davao proposed to declare a People’s Small Scale Mining
Area in accordance with the MAB decision. The notice for the proposed
declaration was approved and issued for publication to notify any and all
oppositors or protestors. The Provincial Mining Regulatory Board dismissed the
oppositions for lack of merit, then segregated and declared the 729-hectare
gold rush area as People's Small Scale Mining Area.
Issues:
I.
Whether the Court of Appeals can set aside the issue of forum shopping and
litis pendencia (SMGMC's petition in G.R. No. 132475), and dwell on the merits;
II.
Whether the DENR Secretary’s decision went beyond the PMRB’s decision,
otherwise, whether the DENR Secretary can modify the PMRB’s decision; and
III.
Whether the DENR Secretary’s modification to divide the 729 hectares into two
areas contravened the mandate of the MAB decision and the purpose of Republic
Act No. 7076.
Held:
Forum
shopping and litis pendencia
Litis
pendencia exists when the following elements are present: “(a) the identity of
parties, or at least such as representing the same interests in both actions;
(b) the identity of rights asserted and relief prayed for, the relief being
founded on the same facts; and (c) the identity of the two cases such that
judgment in one, regardless of which party is successful, would amount to res
judicata
in the other.”
The
existence of litis pendencia also means that the rule against forum shopping
was violated.
Moot
and academic
Apex
Mining v. SMGMC ruled that “the State, through the Executive Department, should
it so desire, may now award mining operations in the disputed area to any qualified
entities it may determine [and] [t]he Mines and Geosciences Bureau may process exploration
permits pending before it, taking into consideration the applicable mining laws,
rules and regulations relative thereto.”
Indeed,
then President Macapagal-Arroyo issued Proclamation No. 297 excluding an area
in Moncayo, Compostela Valley, declaring this as a mineral reservation and as
an environmentally critical area. DENR Administrative Order No. 2002-18
followed, declaring an emergency situation in this gold rush area and ordering
the stoppage of all mining operations. Executive Order No. 217 thereafter
created the National Task Force Diwalwal.
No comments:
Post a Comment